by Joe Scarry
It’s sobering to sit in the UN meeting hall and hear country after country state in polite but urgent tones that the U.S. (and other nuclear states) must eliminate their nuclear weapons, in accordance with Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). For example:
And on and on . . .
I don’t know what else I imagined. (Perhaps they would say, “Sure, you committed to get rid of your nuclear weapons, but we’re easy . . . .” ?) But somehow I was surprised again and again as country after country said, in effect, What you’ve done so far is not good enough and we expect —demand — nothing less than full elimination of your nuclear weapons.
And so I tried for a moment to put myself in their position. How do you formulate a statement that can somehow convince the United States to eliminate its threatening nuclear weapons? How do you formulate the 10th request? Or the 100th? Knowing all the time that the United States is in the position — will always be in the position — to say, “No” ? At what point does it dawn on you that the United States will never give up its nuclear weapons, because it has the power and the rest of the world doesn’t?
And then a thought experiment occurred to me: what if the rest of the world suddenly found itself in a different position? What if the rest of the world had a button in front of them, and by pressing that button, they could make the United States vanish? Would they say, “We must never, ever press this button; no, we will just continue to implore the United States to eliminate the weapons that threaten our destruction” ? Or would the rest of the world say, “This is our only salvation” ?
The biggest wake-up call is learning truly how you are viewed by others.
The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) has filed unprecedented lawsuits against all nine nuclear-armed nations for their failure to negotiate in good faith for nuclear disarmament, as required under the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The suits were filed against all nine nations at the International Court of Justice, with an additional complaint against the United States filed in U.S. Federal District Court.
(See Now HERE’S an “Asia Pivot” I Can Believe In! (Marshall Islands Sues Nuclear “Haves”) )
With the New York Times publishing “analysis” like this, is it any wonder that Americans can say things like . . . “It won’t be a war. We’re just going to drop a few well placed bombs on them” . . . “the object of fighting a war is to ’cause devastation'” . . . “my finger is on the button. Run back to your mud hut or I am going to press it!” . . . “when war is devastating, then people will do everything possible not to get into it!” . . . as some of my high school classmates wrote on Facebook today?
(See The Bankruptcy of U.S. Nuclear Doctrine )
I don’t think Alanna and I ever talked about what it must be like to be trying to escape a shower of sparks and hot ash. But she seemed to know that the sparks and hot ash are too important a part of the picture to be left out.
(See The Children Are Waiting)
We have had a window of opportunity — nearly 70 years in which the constitution of Japan has explicitly renounced war, pointing the way for the rest of us. What have we imaginedwe were supposed to do?
(See Renouncing War: An Opportunity Not To Be Missed )