by Joe Scarry of Scarry Thoughts blog.
But it is time now to turn to the dirty secret of American life and the primary dilemma of the antiwar movement: the military money that flows to EVERY Congressional district, and in particular the “good jobs” that members of Congress think they are protecting when they vote for ever-higher levels of military spending.
A case in point is the drone (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) industry. A high-tech company in the San Diego area called General Atomics is having a field day with these new darlings of the military-industrial complex.
Drones are a rapidly expanding part of the way America wages war everywhere — a “breakthrough” in warfare that poses enormous moral hazard, and one that needs to be stopped dead in its tracks.
Yet with General Atomics creating thousands of jobs — including many, many very good jobs in engineering — in Southern California and elsewhere … what are the chances of getting members of the California congressional delegation to reduce military spending in general and drone appropriations in particular?
I was recently involved in some Twitter exchanges with Dana Rohrabacher, the congressman whose district abuts General Atomics’ area, and who is one of the 50+ members of the Unmanned Systems Caucus in Congress.
Rohrabacher is a big fan of drones.
It should be noted that a lot of people thing that drones are just wonderful: they are high-tech and they keep our military personnel out of harm’s way.
And many people also have a very cloudy notion of the rights and wrongs of “going after” individuals (and their associated communities) when they are perceived to “threaten” the United States.
Rohrabacher is particularly cavalier, if not obtuse. But it is very difficult to imagine any congressman from California having a terribly insightful relationship to the truth about drones and drone killing, when the “well-being” of so much of his/her district is tied to the drone industry.
My initial impulse was to try to focus entirely on Congressman Rohrabacher and his lack of empathy for the victims of drone killing. Certainly “Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun” would take on a new meaning if Dana Rohrabacher’s photograph was paired everywhere it appeared with images of drone victims.
But perhaps it is going to require a much more broad-based discussion — including a more carefully considered definition of “well-being” (one that embraces moral well-being), and the involvement of the entire community in every congressional district.